Benefits and Challenges of Implementing Self-Managing Teams

Boosting team productivity and engagement is a top priority for businesses. In recent years, the concept of self-managing teams has gained popularity as a management strategy. In this blog post, we’ll explore the world of self-managing teams, what they are, and what it takes for them to be successful.


What are Self-Managed Teams?

A self-managed team, or self-managing team, is a group of employees who take responsibility for planning and executing their work without direct supervision from a manager. In this approach, team members have ownership over their workflow, processes, plans, and roles. While there is no traditional hierarchy, leadership and accountability still exist within self-managed teams.

Benefits of Self-Managing Teams

1. Engaged and Valued Employees:

Contrary to popular belief, self-managed teams don’t devolve into chaos. Instead, they establish a hierarchy through roles, focusing on decision-making authority rather than power dependency. This approach makes employees feel valued and fosters a sense of ownership over their roles. Self-management recognizes the inherent ability of workers to direct their own work.

2. Increased Productivity:

Self-management eliminates the complexity often associated with traditional management approaches, resulting in a streamlined process. Employees have complete ownership over project outcomes and their specialised areas. This increased commitment and engagement lead to higher productivity for both individuals and the entire team.

3. Enhanced Innovation:

With each team member assuming a deeper sense of ownership and engagement, self-managed teams benefit from additional viewpoints, ideas, and perspectives. Unlike traditional hierarchical structures that stifle innovation under approval requirements, self-management promotes agility, allowing for the adoption of innovative ideas. This fosters original problem-solving, diverse viewpoints, and improved responsiveness.

4. Workplace Barriers are Reduced:

Working within a hierarchical system often involves navigating politics, bureaucracy, and time-consuming procedures. This can hinder productivity and creativity. In contrast, self-managed teams operate with greater agility, enabling them to respond quickly to opportunities and challenges.

5. Management Pressure is Reduced:

Middle and senior-level managers bear most of the responsibility for leading teams, overseeing projects, and managing administrative tasks. As a result, their ability to think strategically and make big-picture decisions is diminished. By reducing these obligations and granting more authority to the teams, managers can focus on more critical tasks.

Why You Should Build a Self-Managed Team

Self-Managing Teams

1. Transition Challenges:

Transitioning from traditional hierarchies to self-managed teams is not without its challenges. It requires buy-in from employees and leadership, allocation of resources, and time. However, when implemented effectively, self-managed teams can foster creativity, strengthen organisational relationships, and accelerate goal achievement. Here are some goals self-managed teams can help you accomplish:

2. Try New Roles:

In self-managed teams, employees have the opportunity to switch between various jobs, acquiring new skills from their peers. Instead of stagnating in a role, employees can experiment with different positions within the organisation, benefiting from experiential learning and skill-sharing.

3. Leadership Skills:

Self-managed teams provide a unique opportunity for employees to exercise and improve their leadership abilities. Regardless of their typical roles, working in these teams equalises everyone and allows each member to lead, offer advice, and contribute in novel ways.

4. Expertise Development:

Not every employee aspires to take on management or leadership responsibilities. Self-managed teams provide an ideal setting for those who wish to become experts in their field or master a particular skill. With greater involvement and responsibility for their roles, employees develop a deeper understanding of their peers’ work, processes, and outcomes.

5. Improved Decision-Making:

Self-managed teams benefit from diverse perspectives and experiences, resulting in more well-rounded decision-making. Team members are encouraged to make decisions as long as they seek expert counsel and communicate with those directly impacted.

6. Motivation and Engagement:

Each team member in a self-managed team has defined responsibilities, driving them to perform at their best and ensure the team’s success. In contrast, individuals in typical teams may lack motivation and accountability due to a weaker sense of connection with their teammates.

7. Efficiency:

In traditional team structures, managers convey organisational goals to the team and outline how they should work to achieve them. If managers fail to provide enough information or autonomy, the team’s success may suffer. However, self-managed teams are aware of the best ways to allocate their time, talents, and resources, allowing them to collaborate and accomplish tasks without relying on a third party. With less need for supervision, managers can dedicate their time and attention to other projects or departments.

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What are the Characteristics of Self-Managed Teams?

  • Self-driven
  • Trust in each other
  • High self-awareness
  • Effective communication
  • Employee decision-making

2. What are the Cons of Self-Managed Teams?

While self-managed teams offer many benefits, they also have challenges. They require time to organise and function effectively. Successful self-management relies on camaraderie, commitment, and competence, which may not be suitable for every employee. Inadequate training can also lead to a lack of motivation and struggles within self-managed teams.

3. How do Self-Managed Teams Differ From Traditional Hierarchical Teams?

Self-managed teams differ from traditional hierarchical teams in several ways:

  • Decision-making: Self-managed teams make decisions collectively, whereas hierarchical teams rely on managers for decision-making.
  • Structure and hierarchy: Self-managed teams have a flatter organisational structure without a rigid hierarchy.
  • Role distribution: Self-managed teams focus on decision-making authority in roles rather than power distribution.
  • Accountability: In self-managed teams, accountability is shared among team members rather than solely resting on managers.
  • Communication and collaboration: Self-managed teams emphasise open communication and collaboration among team members.

Closing Thoughts:

While not every team may thrive as a self-managed unit, depending on your goals, industry, and workforce, self-management can lead to creative processes, enriching work environments, and a stronger sense of commitment to one’s job. With the right framework and support, self-managed teams have the potential to transform your organisation’s productivity and engagement levels.



Award-winning recruitment software that will find, attract, hire and analyse the way you want to work. At LogicMelon, we have experienced software recruitment marketing specialists to help you build effective recruitment solutions supported by the best customer service you’ll find anywhere!

Email: or call LogicMelon (UK) +44 (0) 203 553 3667 (USA) +1 860 269 3089

This entry was posted in Blog post | Recruitment | Tools & Tips